Publications

Books

[1] Moral Reality and the Empirical Sciences
New York: Routledge. 2018.

> The Book at Routledge (Including Abstract)
> The Book at Amazon (Including Abstract)


Reviewed by:
Jason R. Raibley in Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2020.01.18
Aaron P. Elliott in Ethics 129 (4), 731-736
Razvan Sofroni in Grazer Philosophische Studien 96 (4), 646-654
Joel Marks in Ethical Perspectives 25 (3), 569-571
Michael Klenk in International Journal for the Study of Skepticism forthcoming
Antonio Gaitán Torres in Journal of Moral Philosophy forthcoming


Journal Articles

[1] An Empirical Argument against Moral Non-Cognitivism (together with Jen Wright)
Inquiry. Forthcoming.

[2] Against Overgeneralization Objections to the Argument from Moral Disagreement
South African Journal of Philosophy 39 (3), 261-273. 2020.

[3] X-Phi and Impartiality Thought Experiments: Investigating the Veil of Ignorance (together with Norbert Paulo)
Diametros 17 (64), 72-89. 2020. [Winner of the Diametros International Essay Prize Competition]

[4] Anti-Realist Pluralism: A New Approach to Folk Metaethics (together with Jen Wright)
Review of Philosophy and Psychology 11 (1), 53-82. 2020.

[5] Camus on the Value of Art
Philosophia 48, 365-376. 2020.

[6] Empirical Research on Folk Moral Objectivism (together with Jen Wright)
Philosophy Compass 14 (5), 1-15. 2019.

[7] Open Borders and the Ideality of Approaches: An Analysis of Joseph Carens’ Critique of the Conventional View regarding Immigration
European Journal of Analytic Philosophy 15 (1), 17-34. 2019.

[8] How to Measure Moral Realism
Review of Philosophy and Psychology 9 (3), 647–670. 2018.

[9] Camus’ Feeling of the Absurd
Journal of Value Inquiry 52 (4), 477–490. 2018.

[10] How to Determine whether Evolution Debunks Moral Realism
Jahrbuch für Wissenschaft und Ethik 23 (1), 25-60. 2019.

[11] Can the Empirical Sciences Contribute to the Moral Realism/Anti-Realism Debate?
Synthese 195 (11), 4907–4930. 2018

[12] Entschädigung für historisches Unrecht: Das Argument des anhaltenden Unrechts
Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie 104 (3), 380-396. 2018.

[13] On the Contribution of Philosophical and Geoscientific Inquiry to Geoethics (qua Applied Ethics)
Annals of Geophysics 60 (7). 2017.

[14] Ethical but Upsetting Geoscience Research: A Case Study (together with Florian Ortner)
Annals of Geophysics 60 (7). 2017.

[15] Are Moral Judgements Adaptations? Three Reasons Why It Is so Difficult to Tell
South African Journal of Philosophy 36 (3), 425-439. 2017.

[16] Revisiting Folk Moral Realism
Review of Philosophy & Psychology 8 (2), 455-476. 2017.

[17] Further Problems with Projectivism
South African Journal of Philosophy 35 (1), 92-102. 2016.

[18] Wie schlüssig ist Albert Camus’ frühe Logik des Absurden?
Allgemeine Zeitschrift für Philosophie 41 (1), 59-76. 2016.

[19] Moral Judgements and Emotions: A Less Intimate Relationship than Recently Claimed
Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology 35 (3), 177-195. 2015.

[20] Climate Change Inaction and Moral Nihilism
Ethics, Policy & Environment 18 (2), 202-214. 2015.

[21] Absurdism as Self-Help: Resolving an Essential Inconsistency in Camus’ Early Philosophy
Journal of Camus Studies 2014, 91-102. 2014.

[22] Camus’ Early “Logic of the Absurd”
Journal of Camus Studies 2011, 98-117. 2011.


Chapters

[1] Insufficient Effort Responding in Experimental Philosophy
Lombrozo, Tania; Knobe, Joshua; Nichols, Shaun (eds.): Oxford Studies in Experimental Philosophy, Volume 4. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

[2] Basic Needs and Sufficiency: The Foundations of Intergenerational Justice (together with Lukas Meyer)
Gardiner, Stephen (ed.): The Oxford Handbook of Intergenerational Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Forthcoming.

[3] Psychologische Forschung zum moralischen Realismus und ihre metaethischen Implikationen
Paulo, Norbert; Bublitz, Christoph (eds.): Empirische Ethik: Grundlagentexte aus Psychologie und Philosophie. Berlin: Suhrkamp. 2020.

[4] The Effects of Morality on Acting against Climate Change
Garner, Richard; Joyce, Richard (eds.): The End of Morality. New York: Routledge, 202-219. 2019.

[5] Lastenteilung in der europäischen Asylpolitik
Meyer, Lukas; Reiter, Barbara (eds.): Wem gehört das Klima? Graz: Grazer Universitätsverlag, 21-25. 2017.

[6] Unsere Verantwortung gegenüber Flüchtlingen
Meyer, Lukas; Reiter, Barbara (eds.): Wem gehört das Klima? Graz: Grazer Universitätsverlag, 43-47. 2017.


Conference Articles

[1] Natural Hazards and the Normative Significance of Expectations in Protecting Alpine Communities (together with Florian Ortner, Lukas Meyer and Oliver Sass)
European Geosciences Union (ed.): Geophysical Research Abstracts: Abstracts of the European Geosciences Union General Assembly. Munich: Copernicus. 2017.

[2] Art in the Face of the Absurd
Majetschak, Stefan; Weiberg, Anja (eds.): Contributions of the 39th International Wittgenstein Symposium. Kirchberg am Wechsel: Austrian Ludwig Wittgenstein Society, 196-198. 2016.

[3] Moral Disagreement, Anti-Realism, and the Worry about Overgeneralization
Kanzian, Christian; Mitterer, Josef; Neges, Katharina (eds.): Contributions of the 38th International Wittgenstein Symposium. Kirchberg am Wechsel: Austrian Ludwig Wittgenstein Society, 245-247. 2015.

[4] How Does Moral Nihilism Affect our Taking Action against Climate Change?
Proceedings of the 13. International Conference of ISSEI. 2013.


Edited Volumes

[1] Special Issue on Ethics and Risks (Meyer, Lukas; Stelzer, Harald; Placani, Adriana; Düvel, Eike; Pölzler, Thomas)
Ethical Perspectives 25 (3). 2018.

[2] Special Issue on Legitimate Expectations (Meyer, Lukas; Pölzler, Thomas; Sanklecha, Pranay)
Moral Philosophy & Politics 4 (2). 2017.


Commentaries

[1] Comment on Sabine Hohl and Dominic Roser. Stepping in for the Polluters? Climate Justice under Partial Compliance
Analyse & Kritik 33 (2), 501-508. 2012.


Introductions

[1] Ethics and Risks: Approaches and Issues (Placani, Adriana; Düvel, Eike; Pölzler, Thomas)
Ethical Perspectives 25 (3), 355-361. 2018.

[2] Introduction to the Special Issue on Legitimate Expectations (Meyer, Lukas; Pranay, Sanklecha; Pölzler, Thomas)
Moral Philosophy & Politics 4 (2), 173-175. 2017.


Book Reviews

[1] Review of Robin Attfield’s “Environmental Ethics: A Very Short Introduction”
Environmental Values 28 (4), 507-509. 2019.

[2] Review of Iddo Landau’s “Finding Meaning in an Imperfect World”
Philosophical Quarterly 69 (275), 435-438. 2019.

[3] Review of Kieran Setiya’s “Midlife: A Philosophical Guide”
Ethical Perspectives 25 (3), 575-579. 2018.

[4] Review of Erik J. Wielenberg’s “Robust Ethics: The Metaphysics and Epistemology of Godless Normative Realism”
Ethical Perspectives 22 (3), 509-513. 2015.


Op-eds, Blog Posts, etc.

[1] Who Should Save the Climate? (together with Benedikt Namdar)
Climate Footnotes: Insights on Climate Research. 2020

[2] Mehr Demut, weniger Moral
Der Standard. 2020.

[3] Is Moral Relativism Really a Problem?
Scientific American. 2019.

[4] Nun sag, wie hältst du’s mit der Moral?
FWF Online Magazine scilog (scilog.fwf.ac.at/). 2019.

[5] Sich besser fühlen dank analytischer Philosophie
Philosophy Blog praefaktisch.de. 2019.

[6] Insufficient Effort Responding in Experimental Philosophy, Part II: Survey
The New Experimental Philosophy Blog (xphiblog.com). 2019.

[7] Insufficient Effort Responding in Experimental Philosophy, Part I: Recommendations
The New Experimental Philosophy Blog (xphiblog.com). 2019.

[8] Vertrauen ist gut, Kontrolle ist besser: Experimentelle Philosophie und die Qualität empirischer Daten
Philosophy Blog praefaktisch.de. 2018.